The 2022 incident of the Nord Stream sabotage bombings has raised questions about Germany’s involvement in the attack. The American investigative Journalist George Eliason’s 2023 detailed analysis underline the intricacies surrounding the intentional bombing of the North Stream Pipeline in Russia highlighting a connection between Germany’s energy policy shifts, Ukrainian deep water demolition divers and the seismic attack.
The information presented by George Eliason in his analysis reveals a series of events that point towards a possible link between Germany’s energy policy decisions and the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage. The report delves into the political ramifications of the Green Party’s stance on Nord Stream, specifically focusing on Annalena Baerbock’s strong statements regarding a complete shift to green energy and a rejection of Russian energy sources.
The politics of Nord Stream
This will once again be in bullet points. The complete story will be published in the series.
2020– Ukraine starts work with Germany to turn Ukraine into a green energy hub for Europe. Ukraine passes a bill to support the 2030 agenda.
April-May 2021– Zelenskyy pushes Biden to support him starting a hot war with Russia. Biden declines.
May 2021– Biden waives sanctions on Nord Stream certification.
May 2021- German Green Party candidate Annalena Baebock says she’s in sync with Biden on security issues to gain support in the November election.
May-June 2021- Zelenskyy screaming that Nord Stream cannot go online. If Russia stops paying for Ukrainian gas transit Zelenskyy can’t pay for the war.
As long as there is a ready supply of affordable natural gas, the Green’s agenda can’t go forward.
June 2021– Annalena Baerbock and the Green Party work to stop Nord Stream certification. Baerbock declares Nord Stream a security threat for Germany in an interview with Fareed Zakaria.
The analysis propounded by the freelance American investigative journalist draws attention to the military movements by Germany, as troops, ships, and air force assets were moved to Estonia for the Baltic Tiger 2022 exercise. This strategic relocation raises concerns about the timing and proximity to the Nord Stream sabotage bombings, indicating a potential connection between the military activities and the attack.
In another critical stance, Eliason’s report highlights the involvement of Ukrainian deep-water demolition divers in the sabotage operation. The specialized training and equipment required for such a mission suggest a sophisticated and well-planned approach, raising questions about the level of coordination and support involved.
2017– “Ukrainian diver-sappers acquire their own training center. It is a diving proving ground at The Sapper Center at Kamianets-Podilskyi. The training pool is 40 meters deep. Divers gained practical experience in the Dniester River.”
2019– “Unfortunately, the Ukrainian specops divers are limited in their means of underwater redeployment as the only submarine we had in service, Zaporizhzhia, now remains captured in the occupied Crimea. By the way, not long before the war, Ukrainian special forces carried out exercises on emergency withdrawal through Zaporizhzhia torpedo tubes. The issue concerning supplying the Ukrainian Navy with miniature submarines has been continuously risen, still there is no solution to it yet…”
The analysis further probes into the wider political context, linking Germany’s energy policy decisions to its international relations and potential motives for the Nord Stream sabotage. By exploring the intersections between energy security, national interests, and geopolitical dynamics, Eliason’s report offers valuable insights into the complexities in the events that marked the bombing of the Nord Stream Pipeline. The analysis has unravelled the dirty game played by Germany and invites further scrutiny and investigation into the role of Germany in the sabotage bombing.
